Showing posts with label proctor and gamble. Show all posts
Showing posts with label proctor and gamble. Show all posts

Sunday, 4 March 2012

The Science & Evolution Of A New Soap


Making a new product takes lots of time, money: It took eight years, 450 product sketches, 6,000 consumer tests and hundreds of millions of dollars for Procter & Gamble to create something that it hopes will be destroyed in the wash.

Tide Pods are palm-size, liquid detergent-filled tablets that are designed to be tossed in the washer to take the measuring cups — and messiness — out of laundry. P&G says the product, which hit store shelves last month, is its biggest innovation in laundry in about a quarter of a century.

Tide Pods aren't the sexiest of inventions, but they illustrate how mature companies that are looking for growth often have to tweak things as mundane as soap and detergent. The story behind Tide Pods provides a window into the time, money and brainpower that goes into doing that.

P&G, the maker of everything from Pampers diapers to Pantene shampoo, has built its 175-year history on creating things people need and then improving them. (Think: Ivory soap in 1879; Swiffer Sweeper in 1999.) Each year, the maker of everything from Pampers diapers to Pantene shampoo spends $2 billion on research and development. The company also rolls out 27 products annually, or more than two a month, worldwide.

The focus on innovation has paid off. P&G says 98 percent of American households have at least one of its products in cupboards, broom closets or bathrooms.

And while about 15 to 20 percent of all new products succeed, P&G has claimed a 50 percent success rate. Four of the top 10 new consumer products in 2010 were made by P&G, according to research firm SymphonyIRI.

"What they've gotten very good at is being able to understand consumer expectations," says Robert Passikoff, president of Brand Keys Inc., a New York customer research firm.


But improving things like window cleaner and toilet paper can take years. It also can cost hundreds of millions of dollars — or up to 100 percent of first-year sales — to develop, make and market them. And even then, new products are a tough sale to consumers.

"You have to develop a product that is meaningfully better than the ones out there, which is tough because generally speaking consumer products work pretty well," says Ali Dibadj, an analyst at Bernstein Research who follows P&G. "You then have to convince the consumer to try the product ... and then get that consumer to break their old habit to make a new one."



FIRST LOAD: A PRODUCT IS BORN

The $6.5 billion laundry detergent sector has been ripe for a new product. With the exception of fruity scents and suds that work in cold water, detergent hasn't changed much since P&G rolled out Liquid Tide in 1984.

Liquid Tide, which costs about $15 for 32 loads, is the best-selling detergent, according to SymphonyIRI, the research firm. But cheaper rivals have been gaining: For instance, the number of units sold of Church & Dwight's Arm & Hammer Oxi-Clean Laundry, the No. 2 detergent brand that costs $8 for 35 loads, rose 13 percent in the past year. Unit sales of Liquid Tide were flat.

In 2004, P&G decided to try to freshen up the category. Surveys and observations of 6,000 consumers found that more than a third dreaded doing laundry. A big reason: nearly a quarter said their laundry was in the basement, requiring apartment dwellers to lug a seven-pound detergent bottle up and down stairs.

Researchers also found that people rewashed loads about 20 percent of the time because they thought detergent didn't get their laundry clean enough.

And many were confused about which detergent to use when they wash in different ways: In regular washers and high-efficiency machines; big loads and small ones; and in hot and cold water.

"We knew people felt laundry was complicated," says Alex Keith, vice president of P&G's unit that makes laundry detergents and fabric softeners.

So P&G set about to create a product that weighed less, cleaned better and could be used with any washing machine, any size load and in water at any temperature.



Pod-like products had been on the market before. P&G introduced tablets filled with powder detergent in 2000, but yanked them from stores shelves two years later. The problem was that powder tablets didn't always dissolve completely, leading to messiness. They also only worked in hot water.

To make sure Tide Pods would dissolve in hot and cold water, P&G turned to MonoSol, a company that makes water soluble films. The firm developed a polyvinyl alcohol film that not only dissolves in any temperature water, but even in sweaty palms. The film also is strong — it won't break even when stretched over the top of a can of marbles and shaken — but soft to the touch.

The film created another problem, though. Detergents, which mostly consist of water, would cause the pod to melt before it even gets into the wash. So P&G made a detergent that is 10 percent water — compared with Liquid Tide, which is 50 percent water.

Next, scientists had to figure out how to combine cleansers, brighteners and fabric softeners into one product, while keeping them separate until the pod dissolves in the wash. Doing so would ensure each liquid would work better. After 450 product sketches, P&G developed a proprietary technology that sections the pod into three chambers for all three liquids.

The result? A soft ball with three separate bubbles filled with liquids in Tide's trademark white, blue and orange colors.



INNOVATE, RINSE, REPEAT

Making the product was half the battle. Consumer testing is at the heart of product development for P&G, which has more than 25 facilities across the globe where people can use the things it makes.

The Beckett Ridge Innovation Center, located about 30 minutes from P&G's Cincinnati headquarters, is one of them. Inside, there's a 3,000-square-foot grocery store packed with everything from Charmin diapers to Cascade dishwashing liquid. There's also a 2,000-square-foot mock clapboard house where researchers analyze how people do laundry, wash dishes, take showers and change babies' diapers.

About 50 P&G researchers work at the center, watching and videotaping about 20,000 shoppers each year in their "natural" environment. The testers are picked by third-party companies and paid based on the task they complete.

"When we watch consumers in action, we can see things they can't otherwise explain or articulate," says Jessica Hall White, director of P&G's unit that makes fabric care brands like Tide, Gain and Downy.

When P&G researchers had consumers test Tide Pods at the center, they found that 97 percent were satisfied with their experience, compared with about 68 percent who felt that way beforehand while using regular detergent. People also liked how Tide Pods felt in their hands.



When it came to packaging, P&G took a more futuristic approach to testing. The company used three screens at the Innovation Center to project 3D images of a virtual grocery store. There, testers could see early designs of Tide Pod packaging on the virtual store shelves alongside regular detergents.

Researchers learned that people sometimes looked over the product. So P&G determined that in order to stand out, Tide Pods needed to have see-through packaging. The company developed a clear fishbowl-like container that shows the pods clearly.

The product was developed. The consumer tests were done. The packaging was complete. Next, it was time to get Tide Pods to market. P&G was poised to be the first to have its product priced at $20.89 for 57 pods in stores by September of last year.

But the company ran into problems making the pods, which require different manufacturing equipment than what's used to make regular detergent. At the same time, P&G was flooded with orders from supermarkets and retailers.

P&G declined to give details on the manufacturing problems it had, but it says the issues forced it to push back the launch date of Tide Pods by five months to February. In the hyper-competitive world of consumer products, that might as well be an eternity.

Tide Pods entered a market that was already getting crowded. Henkel's Purex UltraPacks and Sun Products' All Mighty Pacs came out in February, too. And Church and Dwight plans to launch its Toss 'N Done Power Packs— made of crystals — this month.

All of the products — all more expensive than liquid or powder detergents — are priced similarly. An analysis by research firm Janney Capital Markets found that Tide Pods' average price per pod is 27 cents, compared with Church & Dwight's and Sun Product's at 25 cents and Henkel's at 31 cents.

But P&G has a big advantage. The Tide brand is one of the most recognized in the world.

With pricing so close, P&G hopes to win over shoppers with performance and brand recognition. The company says it expects Tide Pods to ring up $300 million in sales during its first year.

San Marco, a Janney Capital analyst, says P&G is at a slight disadvantage because it wasn't first to market its product. But he believes its Tide Pods product is likely to hit its first-year sales goal.

"It seems when Procter does anything in the laundry category it makes a huge wave," he says.

Still, P&G isn't taking chances. The company spent an estimated $150 million on a marketing campaign to roll out Tide Pods. The first commercial debuted during the Academy Awards, one of TV's biggest events.

The tagline for the ad: "Pop In. Stand Out."

Wednesday, 10 June 2009

Fairy Liquid - The UK Window Cleaners Choice

Behind the label - Fairy Liquid:
LISTED INGREDIENTS
15-30% Anionic surfactants, 5-15% Nonionic
surfactants, Perfume, Geraniol, Limonene
-------------------------------------------
Because the dishes are a chore that has to be done, most people never think twice about what’s in a bottle of washing-up liquid. Nevertheless, a product like this can still add to the total toxic load of your body though its use and through is presence in the environment.

In the UK we spend £310 million a year on dishwashing detergents (in the US, the spend is around $1.53 billion) and Fairy Liquid is the UK’s leading brand. With 13 million-plus British households buying 150 million bottles of Fairy Liquid each year, this consumer icon boasts 57 percent of the market, making it the nation’s favourite washing-up brand. Parent company Procter & Gamble (P&G) likes it a lot too, since it is the mainstay of the company’s £7 billion Fabric and Home Care unit- one of P&Gs most successful moneyspinners.

Fairy has maintained its place in the marketplace with clever marketing that makes use of celebrity endorsements and promises of a world of happiness in a bottle. Famous for the ‘mild green Fairy Liquid’ slogan as well as is claim to last 50 per cent longer than any other brand, Fairy boasts a seal of approval by the British Skin Foundation, though this claim is not all that it seems. The British Skin Foundation is a charity that P&G (along with many other product manufacturers) supports financially.

So what’s really in the bottle? No one outside the P&G labs really knows. The ingredients label is woefully inadequate (see above) and P&G told us to find what we were looking for on the internet. After an extensive web search we did indeed find some - but not all - information on the components that make up Fairy Liquid.

• Aqua
• Sodium laureth sulphate
• Alcohol denat
• Lauramine oxide
• C9-11 pareth-8
• Sodium chloride
• 1,3-Cyclohexanedimethanamine
• PPG (polypropylene glycols)
• Dimethyl aminoethyl methecrylate/hydroxyproply acrylate copolymer cirate
• Parfum
• Geraniol
• Limonene
• Colourant




This list corresponds well with P&Gs own ‘safety data sheet’ for its original Fairy Liquid. The first thing that jumps out about this information is how well Fairy illustrates the problem that so little data exists or is indeed required on the components of common household products, even though human exposure and environmental impact are the key issues for a product of this type.

Anionic and non-ionic detergents can cause irritation to the skin, eyes and mucous membranes. Some, such as the ethoxylated alcohols sodium laureth sulphate and C9-11 pareth 8, can be contaminated with the carcinogen 1,4 dioxane. Several of the detergents and perfumes are known allergens and sensitisers, likely to be made harsher by the skin-denaturing effect of sticking your bare hands into hot water. Using a dish detergent in hot water also creates another health hazard- chemical vapours. In hot water the chemicals vaporise and are inhaled as steam; and some of Fairy’s ingredients, such as 1.3-Cyclohexanedimenthanamine, can produce vapours that cause severe irritation to the eyes and respiratory tract.

Among the tonnes of cleaning products we pour down the drain each year are toxic substances that are not processed adequately by sewage treatment plants or septic systems. Although Fairy claims to be biodegradable and complies with EU guidelines in this regard, it can hardly be considered good for the environment. For a detergent to be considered biodegradable by the EU, it need only break down by 660 per cent within 28 days. During those 28 days, residues from detergents and surfactants can build up and cause significant, long-lasting damage to humans, animals and the environment.

According to Greenpeace, Fairy may also contain hormone-disrupting artificial musks, which are potential carcinogens and reproductive toxins both in people and wildlife- again, we don’t know for sure because P&G will not answer the simple question: does it or doesn’t it? In the absence of data, the precautionary principle applies- assume that it does.

In truth, there is no such thing as an ‘environmentally friendly’ detergent. Detergents are always a burden on people and the planet in one way or another. The best action is to buy from manufacturers who strive to go beyond existing regulations- for instance by using vegetable-based detergents, eschewing colours or perfumes, and by making their products biodegrade in days, not weeks.

HANDS THAT DO DISHES

…are still in the majority, but only just. The perceived ‘menial’ nature of household chores means that the era of the dishwasher is upon us. Brits, it seems, are still not afraid to get their hands dirty; and we lag behind many of our neighbours in Europe, where around half of all households own a dishwasher, compared to 36 per cent in thee UK.

The energy-intensive, water-wasting nature of dishwashers aside, most automatic dishwashing detergents are either irritants or corrosives- depending on their composition, concentration, and physical form. They are made with strong petroleum-based detergents and a strong alkali. Skin irritation or burns may occur following exposure to dissolved detergents. Many also contain phosphates that pollute water ways.

Some automatic dishwashing detergents also contain dry chlorine that is activated when mixed with the water in the dishwasher. This means that when you open the dishwasher, chlorine fumes are released in the steam that leaks out. These can cause eye irritation and difficulty breathing, especially for those with respiratory problems.

GREENER ALTERNATIVES: BIO D ECOTOPIA ECOVER SONETT

Wednesday, 16 April 2008

Window Cleaning News Round-Up

The impact of higher oil, product prices on US economy deepens. Both major and independent retailers are closing outlets as a result, he continued. "Liz Claiborne is shuttering 54 Sigrid Olsen stores. Ann Taylor is closing 117 of its 921 stores. Talbot's has closed all of its men's and children's clothing stores along with 22 women's stores. Even Target and Starbucks are seeing a slowdown. Each of these chains are served by countless small businesses that provide window washing and custodial services, paper products, deliveries, alterations and many other services."

Earth day is getting nearer (April 22nd). Almost four decades ago, with the help of college students, staff members and activities coordinator Denis Hayes, Wisconsin Senator Gaylord Nelson founded the first Earth Day. Earth Day 1970 was a grassroots effort to raise environmental awareness. Since then, Earth Day has evolved and expanded into an international day of awareness and activism.

More window cleaning robots are needed in Michigan. If you have a design, you're a student - then you'll need to construct this window first. The 2008 ASME Student Design Competition is under orders for the Winrobo—an automated window washing robot.


Procter & Gamble is giving its Mr. Clean a new job to tackle: washing cars. The company is moving the iconic brand beyond kitchens and bathrooms and is testing its appeal on car washes. P&G has opened two Mr. Clean Performance Car Washes in Ohio, and plans to open up to seven more in Cincinnati, Dayton, OH, and in Kentucky, according to news reports. The car wash features a waiting area with wireless Internet access, flat-screen TVs and a convenience store area, which sells snack and drinks, including P&G¹s Millstone coffee. Mr. Clean car care products are also sold in the stores. A basic wash costs $7.51 and rises up to $16.90 for a gold shine package, according to the Web site http://www.mrcleancarwash.com/. Visitors can pay $24 for a full-service interior and exterior cleaning, which includes a car wash, window cleaning, vacuuming, polish and fragrance.



More window washers Stuck on Building! Atlanta fire and rescue crews came to the aid of a window washing crew in Buckhead Monday afternoon. The crew was working on the 16th floor of a building at 3350 Peachtree Street, when the motor on the scaffolding blew out. Emergency crews worked to get the scaffolding pulled down. No injuries were reported.

Search This Blog