Showing posts with label hse. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hse. Show all posts

Monday, 13 July 2015

Rogue Window Cleaners Reveal Public Perception Of Ladders

Window cleaners have been targeted on social media, but there have been no reports made to the police. 
No complaints over rogue window cleaners in Shepton, say police: Window cleaners in the Shepton Mallet area have been centre stage on social media this week, but for all the wrong reasons. There were a series of posts on Facebook warning of men posing as window cleaners in Shepton Mallet and Evercreech with a view to scoping out or breaking into houses, but police have confirmed that they have not been contacted in relation to these concerns.

Inspector Mark Nicholson, from Avon and Somerset Police, said: "We haven't had any reports of suspicious activity in relation to window cleaners in the Shepton Mallet area and we would ask people to be mindful, when posting on social media, of speculation and comment that could be harmful to legitimate businesses. "However, if you see something suspicious or you suspect a crime is in progress always call us on 999. "We encourage people to be good neighbours and look out for other people in their streets and communities and would certainly ask people to report suspicious activity to us."

A Wells-based window cleaner, who also operates in and around the Shepton area, took to Facebook to reassure his customers, emphasising that he always wears a branded T-shirt when working. Another recounted being treated badly while going about his work.

Suspicions were aroused by men knocking on doors asking residents if they would like their windows cleaned, with some of those approached commenting that the men do not appear fully equipped for the task, carrying only rags and bottles of water.

The men are said to have ladders with them, which some have taken as an indication that they are not legitimate, citing the belief that ladders are now illegal for window cleaners.

The men are said to have ladders with them, which some have taken as an indication that they are not legitimate, citing the belief that ladders are now illegal for window cleaners. However, the Health and Safety Executive simply recommend that ladders should only be used for low-risk, short duration work.

Thursday, 9 July 2015

Window Cleaning Company Fined For Safety Breaches

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) successfully prosecuted Brian Stubbs (director) and Brian Stubbs and Company Limited at Stafford Magistrates’ Court after a window cleaner was observed standing on guttering on the outside of a balcony parapet wall on the third floor of St Joseph’s Nursing Home, Lichfield Road, Stafford.
Window cleaning company fined for safety breaches: A window cleaning firm and its sole director have been fined for health and safety breaches after the company was employed to clean the windows at a nursing home.

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) successfully prosecuted Brian Stubbs (director) and Brian Stubbs and Company Limited at Stafford Magistrates’ Court after a window cleaner was observed standing on guttering on the outside of a balcony parapet wall on the third floor of St Joseph’s Nursing Home, Lichfield Road, Stafford, on 21 August 2014. An HSE investigation found that there was no suitable edge protection or other appropriate safety measures in place.

Mr Stubbs, of Westhead Avenue, Stafford, was fined a total of £660 and ordered to pay £867 costs after pleading guilty to breaching 3(1)(a) of The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999. Brian Stubbs and Company Limited was fined £660 and ordered to pay £846 in costs after pleading guilty to breaching 6(3) of the Work at Height Regulations 2005.

After the case HSE Inspector Katherine Blunt commented: “Work being carried out in this manner was entirely avoidable. This could very easily have been a fatality. “They didn’t have to do the work this way. As advertised on the company’s website, a ‘reach and wash’ system could have been used, which allows the cleaning of windows up to 65 feet.”

For more information on what employers need to do to protect employees when they work at height please visit the HSE webpage here.

Wednesday, 27 May 2015

Scotland The Brave... Stupid

Scotland The Brave... Stupid.
Heartstopping video shows foolhardy window cleaner perching on a tiny ledge four storeys up - without any safety gear: This is the shocking moment when a window cleaner balancing on a top floor ledge - without any safety equipment. Colin Elliot appears to use only his left hand to cling on to the outside of a third floor flat while wiping the windows with his other hand. Witnesses said he left the property through the window before carrying out the dangerous task, branding him 'fearless' but 'stupid'.



Barry McLauchlan, 22, (pictured) who was working on the opposite side of Caird Drive, Glasgow, recorded the terrifying moment on Monday morning. The labourer, from Hamilton, South Lanarkshire, said: 'I was just working away and looked across the street. I noticed this window cleaner. He said: 'I thought nothing of it, but the more I stared I noticed he wasn't wearing any safety equipment. There was no harness or safety aids. 'I was shocked. I was fearing more for his life than he was. 'I saw him climb out of the window. He closed it behind him and washed the window as if it was a ground floor and nothing had happened. 'Except from his hand holding on to the window, there was nothing keeping him there.'

Witnesses branded the daredevil "fearless" and "stupid" as he dangled from a window with just his hand for support, nonchalantly cleaning windows.
The daring window cleaner was named as Colin Elliot from the Partick area of Glasgow. Mr McLauchlan and his colleagues believe he must be self-employed or just a member of the public. He said: 'I work in the construction industry and know how important it is to stick to health and safety. 'He's a braver guy than I am. But there is fearless and then there is stupid. 'You've got to think about health and safety. My thought is that this guy is self-employed because any company's insurance would not have paid for that.'

Barry McLauchlan, 22, who was working on the opposite side of Caird Drive, Glasgow, recorded the terrifying moment on Monday morning.
The Health and Safety Executive (HSE), which regulates the workplace, said it could not comment as the man may have just been a member of the public. But a spokesman added: 'Falls from height are one of the biggest causes of workplace fatalities and major injuries, and we would hope anyone working at height took necessary precautions to prevent an incident.'

Mr Elliot, 56, said he has been cleaning windows for almost 34 years without incident.
However, Colin Elliot said he is the window cleaner captured in the footage. Mr Elliot, 56, said he has been cleaning windows for almost 34 years without incident.  He said: 'No, I don't use safety equipment - it's not like I do the Empire State Building.' Mr Elliot said the tallest buildings he works on are three storeys high. Commenting on those who had questioned his working with no safety
equipment, he said: 'It's just from their point of view. I wouldn't recommend they go out on a window ledge. 'If you're fearful of the activity you shouldn't do it. I have an exceptional head for heights.

Mr Elliot, pictured said: 'Having survived it for 33 and a half years I must be bloody good at risk assessment'.
'I guess I assess the job quick enough and if I thought it was pushing it safety-wise, I say I want to get those windows hinged before I do it. 'I would tell them if they were beyond the pail. I know when a window is too dangerous. 'I never go out on a window ledge if I don't need to. If I have got a bay window I open each of the windows in. My advice is you never take any needless risks. 'Having survived it for 33 and a half years I must be bloody good at risk assessment.' One local resident, who did not wish to be named, said: 'He's a great window cleaner and does a great job, very thorough. He's a very interesting character and has been working in the west end for a very long time.'

Monday, 3 February 2014

New UK Guidance On Working At Height

A brief guide' can be accessed free of charge on line, is significantly simpler to understand and makes it very clear what anyone who works at height or their employers, need to do to properly plan any work at height and dispels a number of classic myths.
http://www.vertikal.net/en/news/story/19310/
New guidance on working at height: The UK HSE has published its new guidance to working at height, including two new concise, easy to read guide books. The launch of this new guidance is pitched by the UK government as a significant step towards reducing red tape, but this is something of a myth as there are no legal changes to what is effectively European wide working at height legislation. However this does not detract from what are major improvements.

The new guides' Work at height - A brief guide' and 'Safe use of ladders - A brief guide' can be accessed free of charge on line, is significantly simpler to understand and makes it very clear what anyone who works at height or their employers, need to do to properly plan any work at height and dispels a number of classic myths.

The HSE summarises the new guidance as:
  • Providing simple advice about do's and don'ts when working at height to ensure people are clear on what the law requires
  • Busting some of the persistent myths about health and safety law, such as the banning of ladders when they can still be used 
  • Offering targeted advice to helping business in different sectors manage serious risks sensibly and proportionately 
  • Helping workers to be clearer about their own responsibilities for working safely.
Click to enlarge.
Printed versions of the two publications are also available for a small fee and can be ordered online, they are hosted on an improved working at height web page which is an excellent source for anyone who works at height. The guides are clearly visible but if you prefer click here to go directly to Work at height - 'A brief guide' and here for 'Safe use of ladders - A brief guide.'

Click to go directly to the guides section of the library
HSE chairman Judith Hackitt said: "It is important to get working at height right. Falls remain one of the biggest causes of serious workplace injury - with more than 40 people killed and 4,000 suffering major injuries every year. We have a sensible set of regulations and have been working with business to improve our guidance - making it simpler and clearer and dispelling some of the persistent myths about what the law requires."

"The result is advice that employers can count on to help them manage their businesses sensibly and proportionately. The need to ensure people understand what the law requires was identified in the independent review of health and safety regulation undertaken by Professor Ragnar L￶fstedt, and this proposal has been developed through the Red Tape Challenge."

For more health & safety guidance forms for window cleaners go here.

Friday, 4 January 2013

Applied Load Points, Vectors & Base Slip For UK Ladders

The Hunter Ladder utilising Applied Load Point (ALP) and a Standard Load Vector (SLV).
RESEARCH AND TESTING: In 2000 the HSE commissioned Loughborough University to undertake detailed research into portable ladders and how they are used and how they fail. The result of their research, published in 2004, is available on the HSE Website. Their research led them to identify four potential failure modes:
  • Base Slip
  • Loss of top contact
  • Top side slip
  • Flip

They also identified the Applied Load Point (ALP) and a Standard Load Vector (SLV – the direction in which load should be applied) and the actual loads required to simulate a ladder user approaching the point of “misuse”. They then produced a Workshop Test Procedure and a series of tests using the ALP and the SLV and the different loads needed to identify if a Device Augmented Ladder (DAL) passed these tests, in which case the ladder was deemed to be “effective”, and fit for use. For a ladder to be deemed “effective” it had to remain standing when subjected to all these tests. This is clearly defined in the WAHR 2005.

DEVELOPMENT: In order to better understand the Loughborough Workshop Test proposals Ladder Safety Devices constructed a nine metre high test rig (right) and carried out extensive empirical tests on various prototypes and was able to develop a system which does indeed prevent failure in all four of the modes identified by the Loughborough report and thus complies with the requirements of the HSE as detailed in the HSE Operational Circular OC200/30 (see paragraph 32-38) issued on 4/11/05.

The result of that development is the range of Hunter Ladders which is unique in being the only range of ladders which are manufactured to the high specification demanded by the British Standard BS EN131 and at the same time comply with the Health and Safety Executive’s equally demanding standards regarding stability, as defined in HSE OC200/30 (see paragraph 32-38).

LEVELLER: It is a requirement of the HSE that the rungs of all ladders must be levelled (i.e.horizontal) before the ladder can be used (See HSE Ladders Leaflet INDG402). Every Hunter Ladder is fitted with an integral leveller in both of its  stiles, each one capable of providing an adjustment of 125mm (5”) in increments of 3mm (1⁄8”). This will enable the ladder to be set up on a slope of 16 degrees – the steepest slope permitted by the HSE. Adjustment is achieved very quickly by positioning the ladder, removing one of the locking pins, allowing the ladder to level itself, replacing the pin in the nearest visible hole (which is never more than 1.5mm (1⁄16”) away) and turning the pin to lock it.

BASE SLIP: The adjustable leveller sections have moulded feet which are made of specially formulated rubber designed to provide a very high level of grip on any substrate giving a level of resistance to base slip which complies with the HSE requirements and far exceeds that provided by standard ladder feet.

RESISTANCE TO SIDE SLIP AND FLIP: Every Hunter Ladder has on each side a one metre long stabilising bar which is clamped on below the bottom rung and hinges down to the ground. A telescopic strut which is attached at each arms centre point has 30 possible locking positions in increments of 12mm, to cater for uneven ground. These arms provide excellent lateral stability and complete resistance to “flip”.

TOP SIDE SLIP: At the top of every Hunter Ladder is a pair of wheels which are clamped to the ladder stiles. The rubber used in the “tyres” is of a special formulation which provides excellent grip on any substrate and gives excellent resistance to Top Side Slip. These wheels are also invaluable when running a ladder up a wall.

The Hunter Ladder: The entire range of Hunter Ladders is the only range of ladders which are manufactured to the high specification demanded by the British Standard BS EN131 and are fully compliant with the Health and Safety Executive’s demanding stability standards HSE OC200/30 paragraphs 32- 38.

The Hunter Stanbilising System Retrofit: A similar degree of stability and safety can be added to your existing ladders by fitting the Hunter Stanbilising System. This kit consists of the same wheels that are fitted to all Hunter Ladders, the same stabilising arms but with a clamp for the top mounting instead of a bolted fixing, plus a pair of levellers which slide over the stile rather than being inside the stile. The degree of stability is the same as in all Hunter Ladders. The end product is equally user-friendly. Fitting requires no drilling. Two kits are available, one with wheels, arms and levellers and one with wheels, arms and feet fitted with slip resistant rubber. Only spanners are needed and these are supplied with every kit.

Monday, 17 December 2012

Verdict, Ladders & Fines For UK Users


Tragic window cleaner used ‘unsafe’ ladders: An elderly window cleaner fell to his death in South Tyneside while using “unsafe” ladders. Robert Veater, 71, was working at a house in Hindmarch Drive, West Boldon, on November 8 when he slipped and fell. An inquest was told that Mr Veater suffered extensive brain and other injuries in the 12ft fall. After hearing evidence about the poor state of the ladders Mr Veater was using at the time, South Tyneside Coroner Terence Carney said: “This was sadly an accident waiting to happen.”

The hearing was told the metal ladders were hand-made in places and were not fitted with rubber feet. Mr Veater fell off the ladder while cleaning windows at the home of couple Glen Cattanach and Joanne Rowland, who came to his aid after hearing a loud crash. The couple were commended by the coroner for their actions, including putting the injured man in the recovery position and trying to clear his airway.

Pathologist Dr Nigel Cooper said death was the result of a blunt head injury, after Mr Veater slipped from the ladders and fell on to a sloping driveway. Mr Veater, of Durham Road, Sunderland, was initially taken to Newcastle’s Royal Victoria Infirmary but, after he suffered respiratory arrest, the ambulance was diverted to South Tyneside District Hospital, where he was pronounced dead.

Det Insp Caroline Ord, who investigated the fatal fall, said: “Mr Veater worked alone and usually anchored his ladders to a vehicle, but the ladders did not stay that way. “The two-piece ladder was not the safest and not in the best of repair. “In my opinion, the ladders slipped.” Mr Carney said: “Mr Veater died as the result of a blunt head injury and that blunt head injury occurred inadvertently in a fall.” Verdict: accidental death.

Trade in your old or dodgy ladders and get a brand new shiny safe ladder in return! The Ladder Exchange is a great example of how everyone in the health and safety system can share responsibility and work together towards a common goal; namely, reducing falls from height.

10,000 Ladders and Rising !!! With immediate effect, the Ladder Association has assumed responsibility for delivering the annual Ladder Exchange. Since its launch, the initiative has been responsible for removing over 10,000 broken, bent or damaged ladders from the workplace with the message 'Don't let a dodgy ladder shatter your life'. Now in its sixth consecutive year, the Ladder Exchange, which begins on 1 September and runs until 30 November 2012, provides all businesses with the opportunity to exchange broken, bent or damaged ladders for safe, new ones at a discounted price.

Actively supported by the Ladder Association and its members who, throughout, have made a firm commitment to work in partnership with HSE and the access industry, the Exchange has also contributed to raising awareness and understanding of how to use ladders and stepladders safely. Under the scheme, suspect ladders can be exchanged, at a discount, at participating partners. The Ladder Exchange is a great example of how everyone in the health and safety system can share responsibility and work together towards a common goal; namely, reducing falls from height.

Falls from height: Despite a steady decline, falls from height remain the most common kind of workplace fatality. In 2010/11, a total of 38 workers died and 4,327 employees suffered a major injury as a result of a fall from height in the workplace, with a further 10,232 employees suffering an ‘over 3 day’ injury. Many of these incidents could have been avoided by people with the right training using the correct equipment that had been properly inspected and maintained.
*Please contact the ladder association for more information even though the time-line has passed.

Fee for Intervention (FFI) - HSE now operates a Fee for Intervention (FFI) cost recovery scheme, which came into effect on 1 October 2012. Under The Health and Safety (Fees) Regulations 2012, those who break health and safety laws are liable for recovery of HSE’s related costs, including inspection, investigation and taking enforcement action. Download the pdf file.

Why is FFI being introduced? HSE and the government believe it is right that businesses that break health and safety laws should pay for HSE’s time in putting matters right, investigating and taking enforcement action. Before FFI was introduced, this was paid for from the public purse. FFI will also encourage businesses to comply in the first place or put matters right quickly when they don’t. It will also discourage businesses who think that they can undercut their competitors by not complying with the law and putting people at risk.

Will FFI apply to me? If you comply with the law you won’t pay a fee.
FFI only applies to work carried out by HSE’s inspectors so if your business is inspected for health and safety by another regulator, such as local authority environmental health officers, it will not apply. FFI will apply to all businesses and organisations inspected by HSE, except for:
  • self-employed people who don’t put people at risk by their work; 
  • those who are already paying fees to HSE for the work through other arrangements; 
  • and those who deliberately work with certain biological agents.

Tuesday, 12 April 2011

Idiot Window Cleaner Of The Day


Hanging Out on Park Avenue: Upper East Side - Tough times on Park Avenue? A tipster spots sight more curious on the Gold Coast, adding, "They have resorted to rigging-less window washing dangled on ledges. Professional or homeowner? Click to enlarge.

Falling At Work From A Low Height Can Be As Dangerous As Falls From Height: A recent case where a worker was injured falling from just 10 feet has highlighted the dangers of low level falls. Most people assume that falling from above five metres will result in serious injury, but it is often assumed that falling from a lower level will not result in anything other than a few bumps and bruises. But this recent case, where a worker suffered head and rib injuries falling from a racking storage unit he was assembling, has brought home the truth of the matter - even a low level fall can cause serious injury.

The company was fined £10,000 and ordered to pay costs of over £7,500 after pleading guilty to breaching Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974. The court was told that there was no edge protection to prevent a fall and consequently the man suffered broken ribs and head injuries.

It drives home the fact that companies cannot afford to be complacent about 'quick jobs' at any height. Whenever any worker is required to work at height, employers need to be aware that there must be adequate protection around the edges of raised areas to warn of the dangers and prevent falls. It is something that is easily implemented and could easily save both money and lives. Falls from height still constitute the biggest number of injuries at work every year, particularly in the building trade. And while employers are very aware of the risks involved when working at heights above five metres, lower level working is often regarded as 'not that much of a risk'. This is completely the wrong attitude to adopt, as any fall, even from a low level carries the risk of injury or even death.

The HSE have made it very clear that they will not accept any excuses for injuries sustained from falls from any height. Employers have a duty of care and a responsibility to protect workers in every aspect of their working environment, whether that's 30 feet up a ladder or 10 feet on a racking storage unit. The truth is that any fall can lead to an injury and if there hasn't been adequate safeguards installed by the employer, they are leaving themselves wide open to an injury at work claim for compensation. There is always a risk working at any height, but safety measures to minimise the risk should always be employed, no matter how 'silly' it may seem. Although working at 10 feet probably won't require the use of a harness, for example, it certainly requires that the employer protect the worker's health and safety by ensuring that there are adequate edge guards in place to prevent a fall.

The human body doesn't take impacts very well. It is easy to cause serious damage from a low level fall, and the HSE is concentrating on making employers and employees aware of the risks. On average, 13 people die every year as a result of falling from a ladder, and nearly 1,200 are seriously injured. And that's just from ladders - what could be considered as 'low level' falls. It's up to employers to ensure that number is reduced through the implementation of fundamental and very basic safety measures. Those who suffer as a result of any lapses in that duty of care are fully justified in pursuing a compensation claim for injuries sustained with the full force of the law.

In 2008/2009 over 4000 major injuries were caused by falls from height at work. You may think that you are doing everything you can to prevent falls from height at work but everyone could do more. This site offers advice and information for both workers and employers to help you stay safe.

Heights/Falls from Height: This page gives details of safety issues around working at height and how to assess and reduce the risks. This page also gives details of legal duties and obligations around working at height and links to further information.

Tuesday, 11 May 2010

European Window Cleaners: No Risk Assessment - Employers Fined

Client jointly responsible for window cleaner safety - Building owner fined following fall of cleaning contractor employee:

Lincoln College has today been fined £1,500 after a window cleaner fell 4m suffering broken ribs and a serious back injury. James Theaker aged 50, from Lincoln, was employed by A Nicoll & Son Ltd, when he was contracted to clean windows at Lincoln College on 4 November 2008. Mr Theaker accessed the roof of the main reception building using a ladder. He fell whilst leaning against the building to clean nearby windows. He spent a week in hospital and off work for months and can now only carry out restricted duties.
Lincoln College pleaded guilty to breaching the MHSW Regulations 1999 by failing to conduct a sufficient risk assessment. The college was also ordered to pay £9,500 towards prosecution costs. The prosecution follows an early hearing at which window cleaning contractor A Nicoll & Son Ltd pleaded guilty for its role in the incident and was ordered to pay over £5,000 in fines and prosecution costs.

The Judge points out duties of building occupiers: District Judge Richard Blake said: “It is important that those who occupy buildings and employ contractors assess the risks to ensure best work practices are adhered to.” Following the hearing, HSE Inspector Judith McNulty-Green said: “Mr Theaker has suffered life-changing injuries as a result of his fall. Lincoln College had a legal duty to check its contractors had proper procedures in place but failed to do so. “Employers and organisations that hire contract staff have a joint responsibility to ensure the safety of all staff who work on site, to avoid serious incidents such as this.”

Risk assessment from the "The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999"

3. - (1) Every employer shall make a suitable and sufficient assessment of -

(a) the risks to the health and safety of his employees to which they are exposed whilst they are at work; and
(b) the risks to the health and safety of persons not in his employment arising out of or in connection with the conduct by him of his undertaking, for the purpose of identifying the measures he needs to take to comply with the requirements and prohibitions imposed upon him by or under the relevant statutory provisions and by Part II of the Fire Precautions (Workplace) Regulations 1997.

(2) Every self-employed person shall make a suitable and sufficient assessment of -
(a) the risks to his own health and safety to which he is exposed whilst he is at work; and
(b) the risks to the health and safety of persons not in his employment arising out of or in connection with the conduct by him of his undertaking, for the purpose of identifying the measures he needs to take to comply with the requirements and prohibitions imposed upon him by or under the relevant statutory provisions.

(3) Any assessment such as is referred to in paragraph (1) or (2) shall be reviewed by the employer or self-employed person who made it if -
(a) there is reason to suspect that it is no longer valid; or
(b) there has been a significant change in the matters to which it relates; and where as a result of any such review changes to an assessment are required, the employer or self-employed person concerned shall make them.

(4) An employer shall not employ a young person unless he has, in relation to risks to the health and safety of young persons, made or reviewed an assessment in accordance with paragraphs (1) and (5).

(5) In making or reviewing the assessment, an employer who employs or is to employ a young person shall take particular account of -
(a) the inexperience, lack of awareness of risks and immaturity of young persons;
(b) the fitting-out and layout of the workplace and the workstation;
(c) the nature, degree and duration of exposure to physical, biological and chemical agents;
(d) the form, range, and use of work equipment and the way in which it is handled;
(e) the organisation of processes and activities;
(f) the extent of the health and safety training provided or to be provided to young persons; and
(g) risks from agents, processes and work listed in the Annex to Council Directive 94/33/EC[8] on the protection of young people at work.

(6) Where the employer employs five or more employees, he shall record -
(a) the significant findings of the assessment; and
(b) any group of his employees identified by it as being especially at risk.



How do I carry out a risk assessment?

Questions to ask!

Wednesday, 10 March 2010

Window Cleaning News

The window cleaners of one of Britain's tallest buildings have given their backing to a national safety campaign warning about the dangers of slips, trips and falls in the workplace. Canary Wharf Management, managers of One Canada Square and the contractors for Classic Cleaning Services, the firm which cleans the windows of Canary Wharf in London, has said it is lending its support to the Health and Safety Executive's (HSE's) Shattered Lives campaign. Peter Kyte, managing director of Canary Wharf Management, said that safety needs to be put first whether this is when constructing buildings or managing them.
"We are conscious of the fact that many accidents in the workplace can be directly related to slips, trips and falls. We do all we can through training to make sure that all workers on the Canary Wharf estate are aware of hazards," he added. Earlier this week, Dr Paul Stollard, HSE director for Scotland, said that slips, trips and falls shatter the lives of thousands of British workers every year.

Two drunken revellers who savagely attacked a man in Bradford city centre were locked up overnight to be sentenced by a judge. Maciez Malacha was found lying in a pool of blood after he was beaten unconscious outside Funkys Nightclub in Ivegate, Bradford Crown Court was told today. Talented footballer Jamie Sugden admitted punching Mr Malacha once and stamping five times on his head. Sugden, 26, who plays for Bradford Park Avenue reserves, had been out on the town celebrating his birthday, the court was told. In the dock with him was Adam Hodgson, 22, whose powerful uppercut knocked Mr Malacha, a Polish national, to the ground. Sugden told police he was out drinking to celebrate his 25th birthday. Hodgson said he had downed ten pints of beer and three Jack Daniels whiskies. Rob Casey, solicitor advocate for Sugden, said he was a family man who had stopped binge-drinking. He worked as a window-cleaner and played football at the weekend. The judge branded it “a premeditated, gratuitous, attack” and warned the defendants to expect jail sentences.

Personal Assistant Awarded $5 Million in Lawsuit Alleging Forced Oral Sex: Miami, FL: A $5 Million settlement of punitive damages has been awarded to a former personal assistant to Rev. Ike Eikerenkoetter, who alleged that he performed oral sex on the preacher under threat of termination. Augusto Medina, the assistant, also alleged that the reverend grabbed his crotch while he was giving him a massage. Massage was one of his job duties as well as being the reverend's chauffeur and window washer. At trial, Medina presented his clothing with Eikerenkoetter's semen on it.

James Sanchez Castillo (pictured) last year shot and killed a man who jumped out of a car and into his face. On Friday, Castillo walked out of the courtroom with a probation term and four months already served in county jail, the result of a plea bargain in a case that, according to the judge, contained a major slice of self-defense. "In America, you still have a right to defend yourself on your own property," Sacramento Superior Court Judge Maryanne G. Gilliard said from the bench. Castillo, 31, gunned down Leopoldo Velasco III, 23, last April 24, in a deadly conclusion to a week's worth of warfare between the women in their lives.
A window washer who makes $1,200 a month, Castillo's record contains convictions for drunken driving and resisting arrest. But his court file also was stuffed with 17 letters from friends, bosses and relatives who called him a hard worker, a good father, son and husband, a committed youth football coach and concerned parent who helped out at his kids' school. Recounting last April's shooting, Gilliard said, "These things don't happen in slow motion. They happen very, very quickly. And in a split second, a living, breathing person is now dead in the street." The judge said it was a killing that "never should have happened."

The Beijing People's Procuratorate has sued 21 suspects in the CCTV Tower fire case. Last weekend, the procuratorate released a 9page indictment, from which people can learn how the fire started. According to the indictment, the direct cause of the fire was sparks from fireworks that dropped into a window cleaner's store, which was full of inflammables. The document also said that Xu Wei, director of the construction site office, without authorization, planned to set off fireworks to celebrate the Lantern Festival on February 9, 2009. Two of his subordinates arranged the celebration and set off the fireworks, both were later arrested. On the night of February 9, the fireworks were set off. Liu Jun and Gao Hong, two safety production directors of the construction site did not stop it. The fire caused 160 million yuan ($23.49 million) in losses, killed one and injured eight.

A drunken father held his one-year-old daughter out of an upstairs window during a six-hour police siege at his home. Window cleaner Geoffrey Fairclough was warned he could face jail after pleading guilty to child cruelty along with a charge of common assault on the child's mother. Fairclough, 45, stumbled as he stepped on to the window ledge 15ft up at his home in Eldon Street, Plungington, after snatching the baby from her cot at her mother's home. Prosecutor Sarah Gruffydd told Preston magistrates Fairclough had gone back to the mother's house in Lawson Street – where a teenager was babysitting – after drinking in the Market Tavern, Old Bull and Assembly pubs on October 16 with his former partner and mother of his baby. The woman had ended the relationship when a drunken row broke out, during which Fairclough claimed he was kicked. The row escalated and Fairclough took his sleeping daughter from her cot in her mother's bedroom and left the house. The child's mother, Renee Middleton, tried to stop him, but Fairclough punched her in the face before taking his daughter out into the night at around 2.45am dressed only in a sleepsuit.
Police were called and, after searching the area, went to Fairclough's home, which was in darkness. He appeared at the upstairs window, with the tot in his arms, refusing to answer the door and shouting obscenities and "Fathers for justice" at police officers. Miss Gruffydd said: "He opened the window fully. "He had the baby in the crook of his arm, took hold of the window frame with his left hand and stepped with one foot on to the window ledge." Police officers said the baby was in front of Fairclough "dangling" over his right arm. He was clearly drunk and stumbled as he stepped on to the window ledge. Miss Gruffydd said, "The only way he was prevented from falling was the baby caught on the window frame." Fairclough then barricaded himself and the child – who was crying hysterically – into the house, continuing to be verbally abusive to police, and throwing water at them. He eventually handed the baby to police negotiators at around 8.50am, when they agreed to return the child to her mother under supervision. The baby had a bruise on her forehead, but a hospital examination showed she was otherwise unharmed. Greg Earnshaw said it was not a case like Michael Jackson's: "He's not showing the child off to a crowd and he's not dangling her over the pavement. He's opening the window to say here she is."

Police are appealing for the public's help following a series of incidents involving a bogus window cleaner in the Brislington area of Bristol. Over the past few weeks, there have been a number of reports of a male knocking on doors in the area asking householders if he could clean their windows. The male has sometimes claimed to be working on behalf of their regular window cleaner. Now the public are being asked for help identifying this male. He has been described as white, aged in his 30's and of slim build. Police are also reminding the community to be vigilant of this male and to report anything suspicious.
Anyone who might have information as to his identity or who may have witnessed a similar incident is asked to contact the Brislington Neighbourhood Police Team or Bristol Doorstep Crime Team on 0845 456 7000. Alternatively, if you wish to remain completely anonymous you can contact Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111 or on the internet via www.crimestoppers.org.uk.

Shawn Ahrens (pictured) was reluctant to be the center of attention, but he was the man of the hour Monday night during a fundraiser in his honor. "It blows my mind that this many people came out...I can't even put it into words," said Ahrens. Ahrens is a Cicero firefighter, who was hurt last month while fighting a fire that swept through an apartment building, killing seven people. Ahrens was seriously injured when a chimney fell through the roof and has been sidelined from all three of his jobs: firefighter, fire investigator and window washer. His wife was laid off last year, and both are trying to support their son and a terminally ill daughter with special needs. So hundreds of firefighters paid $25 a head to help with their expenses.
Ahren's father is just thankful he has his son. "Thank God he came around. They worked on him. A miracle," said Dennis Ahrens, father. The fire that broke out early on Valentine's Day was arson at the hands of the building's owner and maintenance man, according to prosecutors. Lawrence Myers and Marion Comier were both charged last week with first degree murder and arson. Prosecutors say Myers hired Comier to torch the building to cash in on a quarter million dollar insurance policy. Six members of a family, including a 3-day old baby and a family friend were killed. "It's a despicable act that people can kill people just for money. It's money. You can always make more of it. You can't replace human lives," said Ahrens. On Tuesday morning, Cicero town president Larry Dominick will make a statement during the town board meeting urging state's attorney Anita Alvarez to seek the death penalty against Myers and Comier.

The system works like this; lets say you currently use ncpm247.com to clean your windows or you would like to start using them to clean your windows and are able to find 5 other people in your near vicinity or area who would also commit to have their windows cleaned on the same cycle. Ncpm247.com will then clean you and your neighbours windows but wont charge you, as the organiser a single penny. The scheme started this month and has already started to cause quite a stir, with some residents effectively becoming agents for the company and receiving a commission in the way of free window cleaning services.

Marie Frederiksen ended her speech with the following words: “With a planned economy, we would be able to immediately increase production and use the technology to the benefit of the majority. The working week could be shortened immediately, which would mark a decisive shift in the emancipation of women. We would be able to use the resources of society to improve the public welfare in such a way that workers, children, the elderly and sick could achieve decent conditions. Furthermore, we would be able to use the technology to remove almost all housework. Robot vacuum cleaners, dishwashing machines, public laundries, renovated houses, public window cleaning, public cleaning, public restaurants with good, healthy and cheap food for all, meals in all nurseries, schools and workplaces and so on – this would be the beginning of the emancipation of humanity. This can only be achieved through socialism.”

Funeral of former manager at Warrington Fire Station: Cheshire Fire Service will provide a vintage vehicle to lead the way to Walton Crematorium for the funeral of Kenneth Coleman, a former Warrington Fire Station manager. Mr Coleman, known as Henry by his colleagues in the town, died at his St Bridget’s Close, Fearnhead, home last Monday, March 1, from ischemic heart disease. “He was a hard working family man. He had never been unemployed in his life. As well as being a fireman in Leeds and York he had a window cleaning round because they didn’t pay much.”

The Empire State Building to Undergo a Unique Window Retrofit Approach to Sustainability: Sustainability and energy efficiency have become monikers for many of today’s retrofit and new construction building projects, and the Empire State Building is no exception. More than 6,500 windows in the iconic building are being upgraded by Serious Materials as part of an energy-efficiency retrofit project, which was announced last April.
Johnson Controls, a provider of energy efficient and sustainable products, services and solutions, selected Serious Materials to “super-insulate” the windows. Serious Materials is providing its SeriousGlass™ technology through a sustainable production process designed to directly reduce energy costs by more than $400,000 per year. The new units will increase the thermal performance of the windows by up to four times their current thermal performance and will also reduce solar heat gain by more than 50 percent compared to the older windows.
“All of that glass is coming out, but it’s not going to be crushed and it’s not going to be thrown away. We are unsealing/un-glazing [the IG units], then scraping and cleaning the glass and then re-using it. We have done this successfully before; you can absolutely re-use glass where it’s going back into the same frame, for instance … this is uncoated, clear glass,” Surace adds of the approximate 26,000 panes of glass in the 6,514 windows.

Search This Blog